Thank you so much for your involvement with the Owner's Club Forum! We hope you've gotten some great information and had the chance to interact with other owners on the current system.

Will 4-Stroke OB Be Too Heavy?

whs2104
whs2104 Member Posts: 3
I'm considering a new Merc 150hp 4-stroke outboard for my 1988 Fundeck 226. The boat is rated for 200hp, but back in 1988 that probably assumed a much lighter 2-stroke. The Merc 150 weighs approx. 450 lbs. Will it be too heavy for this boat?

Answers

  • nquirk
    nquirk Member, Moderator Posts: 672 ✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2013

    I've done a quick search on 1988 Mercury outboards and found on the NADA guides that the 150HP version weighed 378lbs.  Interestingly enough, they list the 200HP (top rated engine) is at 358lbs.

    A 2013 2 stroke runs 431lbs and a 4 stroke is around 450lbs.

    In newer boats, the rating is in Max HP, but sometimes includes a maximum weight as well.  These combined factors will determine if its suitable.  (Perhaps Hurricane Engineering Dept can advise if there was a maximum weight specification for that model in that year)

    The weight, combined with the HP of the engine will determine the overall stresses exerted on the transom.

    While its a 12-15% increase in weight, it's a 25% decrease in HP so the combination may be safe to implement (given the assumption that the transom is in very good condition)

    Given the fact that a current 226 will support a current 200HP engine, I'd be inclined to believe that a 150HP 4 stroke from today would still be suitable for your application, with note that the bow rise will be slightly higher as a result of the weight.  I'd still like to hear from Hurricane Engineering Dept on this as I don't know the impact of the extra 70lbs of weight)

    Hope this helps.

     

     

     

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2010 Hurricane SS 188 OB
    2010 Mercury Optimax 200HP / Mercury SS High Five 19P
    2010 Trailmaster SC trailer
  • whs2104
    whs2104 Member Posts: 3
    Thanks - this helps.  Hope the engineering dept will comment as well.
  • Capt_Steve
    Capt_Steve Member Posts: 416 admin
    @whs2104 ... I've asked Jeremy for an opinion on this...just awaiting response. Notice that I didn't ask him to "weigh in"...that would have been corny.
  • Capt_Steve
    Capt_Steve Member Posts: 416 admin
    @whs2104 ... according to engineering, that motor will be just fine on your boat.
  • whs2104
    whs2104 Member Posts: 3
    That's great news - thanks so much for the quick responses!
  • servmgr64
    servmgr64 Member Posts: 25 ✭✭
    I bought that same boat with that same motor and am very pleased with performance & fuel economy so far. I just got back from Alaska & that is the motor that a lot of the lodges are going to. Servmgr64 2013 FD226 2013 mercury 150 4 stroke 2014 Shorelander trailer
    servmgr64 2013 FD226 2013 Mercury 150 4-stroke 2014 Shorelander